Skip to content

Correlation of neonatal intensive care unit performance across multiple measures of quality of care.

CPQCC Publication
TitleCorrelation of neonatal intensive care unit performance across multiple measures of quality of care.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2013
AuthorsProfit J, Zupancic JAF, Gould JB, Pietz K, Kowalkowski MA, Draper D, Hysong SJ, Petersen LA
JournalJAMA Pediatr
Volume167
Issue1
Pagination47-54
Date Published2013 Jan
ISSN2168-6211
KeywordsBenchmarking, California, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Diseases, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Intensive Care, Neonatal, Logistic Models, Male, Models, Statistical, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Quality Indicators, Health Care, Risk Adjustment
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether high performance on one measure of quality is associated with high performance on others and to develop a data-driven explanatory model of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) performance.

DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional data analysis of a statewide perinatal care database. Risk-adjusted NICU ranks were computed for each of 8 measures of quality selected based on expert input. Correlations across measures were tested using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine whether underlying factors were driving the correlations.

SETTING: Twenty-two regional NICUs in California.

PATIENTS: In total, 5445 very low-birth-weight infants cared for between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2007.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Pneumothorax, growth velocity, health care-associated infection, antenatal corticosteroid use, hypothermia during the first hour of life, chronic lung disease, mortality in the NICU, and discharge on any human breast milk.

RESULTS: The NICUs varied substantially in their clinical performance across measures of quality. Of 28 unit-level correlations, 6 were significant (ρ < .05). Correlations between pairs of measures of quality of care were strong (ρ ≥ .5) for 1 pair, moderate (range, ρ ≥ .3 to ρ < .5) for 8 pairs, weak (range, ρ ≥ .1 to ρ < .3) for 5 pairs, and negligible (ρ < .1) for 14 pairs. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 4 underlying factors of quality in this sample. Pneumothorax, mortality in the NICU, and antenatal corticosteroid use loaded on factor 1; growth velocity and health care-associated infection loaded on factor 2; chronic lung disease loaded on factor 3; and discharge on any human breast milk loaded on factor 4.

CONCLUSION: In this sample, the ability of individual measures of quality to explain overall quality of neonatal intensive care was modest.

DOI10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.418
Alternate JournalJAMA Pediatr
PubMed ID23403539
PubMed Central IDPMC4028032
Grant ListK23 HD056298 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
1 K23 HD056298 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States