Skip to content

Predicting time to hospital discharge for extremely preterm infants.

CPQCC Publication
TitlePredicting time to hospital discharge for extremely preterm infants.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsHintz SR, Bann CM, Ambalavanan N, C Cotten M, Das A, Higgins RD
Corporate AuthorsEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network
JournalPediatrics
Volume125
Issue1
Paginatione146-54
Date Published2010 Jan
ISSN1098-4275
KeywordsCohort Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Diseases, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Length of Stay, Linear Models, Male, Patient Discharge, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Probability, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Survival Analysis, Time Factors
Abstract

BACKGROUND: As extremely preterm infant mortality rates have decreased, concerns regarding resource use have intensified. Accurate models for predicting time to hospital discharge could aid in resource planning, family counseling, and stimulate quality-improvement initiatives.

OBJECTIVES: To develop, validate, and compare several models for predicting the time to hospital discharge for infants <27 weeks' estimated gestational age, on the basis of time-dependent covariates as well as the presence of 5 key risk factors as predictors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of infants <27 weeks' estimated gestational age who were born between July 2002 and December 2005 and survived to discharge from a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network site. Time to discharge was modeled as continuous (postmenstrual age at discharge) and categorical (early and late discharge) variables. Three linear and logistic regression models with time-dependent covariate inclusion were developed (perinatal factors only, perinatal + early-neonatal factors, and perinatal + early-neonatal + later factors). Models for early and late discharge that used the cumulative presence of 5 key risk factors as predictors were also evaluated. Predictive capabilities were compared by using the coefficient of determination (R(2)) for the linear models and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve for the logistic models.

RESULTS: Data from 2254 infants were included. Prediction of postmenstrual age at discharge was poor. However, models that incorporated later clinical characteristics were more accurate in predicting early or late discharge (AUC: 0.76-0.83 [full models] vs 0.56-0.69 [perinatal factor models]). In simplified key-risk-factors models, the predicted probabilities for early and late discharge compared favorably with the observed rates. Furthermore, the AUC (0.75-0.77) was similar to those of the models that included the full factor set.

CONCLUSIONS: Prediction of early or late discharge is poor if only perinatal factors are considered, but it improves substantially with knowledge of later-occurring morbidities. Predictive models that use a few key risk factors are comparable to the full models and may offer a clinically applicable strategy.

DOI10.1542/peds.2009-0810
Alternate JournalPediatrics
PubMed ID20008430
PubMed Central IDPMC2951502
Grant ListU10 HD27851 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10HD40492 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD027856 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD40689 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD021373 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD027880-20 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD021385 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR44 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
U01 HD036790 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR6022 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD21364 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD34216 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD021364 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD027880 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR70 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD040521 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD40521 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD27880 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR008084 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD27904 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR633 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD040461 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD40498 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD27871 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR016587 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR7122 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD040689 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD040492 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD027853 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD027904 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD021397 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD27856 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD40461 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR39 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR30 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
UL1 TR000454 / TR / NCATS NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD027871 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD027880-19 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR007122 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD027851 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR80 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR16587 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD21397 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U01 HD36790 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR750 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR8084 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD21373 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD21385 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR32 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD034216 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10 HD040498 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
U10HD27853 / HD / NICHD NIH HHS / United States
M01 RR006022 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States