Skip to content

Rural Residence and Factors Associated with Attendance at the Second High-Risk Infant Follow-up Clinic Visit for Very Low Birth Weight Infants in California.

CPQCC Publication
TitleRural Residence and Factors Associated with Attendance at the Second High-Risk Infant Follow-up Clinic Visit for Very Low Birth Weight Infants in California.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuthorsFuller MG, Lu T, Gray EE, Jocson MAL, Barger MK, Bennett M, Lee HC, Hintz SR
JournalAm J Perinatol
Date Published2021 May 27
ISSN1098-8785
Abstract

OBJECTIVE:  This study was aimed to determine factors associated with attendance at the second high-risk infant follow-up (HRIF) visit (V2) by 20 months of corrected age after a successful first visit (V1), and the impact of rural residence on attendance rates in a statewide population of very low birth weight (VLBW; <1,500 g) infants.

STUDY DESIGN:  Data linked from the California Perinatal Quality of Care Collaborative (CPQCC) Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) database and CPQCC-California Children's Services (CCS) HRIF database. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated independent associations of sociodemographic, maternal, family, neonatal clinical, and individual HRIF program differences (factors) with successful V2 in VLBW infants born in 2010 to 2012.

RESULTS:  Of 7,295 eligible VLBW infants, 75% (5,475) attended V2. Sociodemographic factors independently associated with nonattendance included maternal race of Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-0.75), public insurance (aOR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.91), and rural residence (aOR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.61-0.9). Factors identified at V1that were associated with V2 attendance included attending V1 within the recommended window (aOR = 2.34; 95% CI: 1.99-2.75) and early intervention enrollment (aOR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.12-1.61). Neonatal factors associated with attendance included birth weight ≤750 g (aOR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.48-2.5). There were significant program differences with risk-adjusted rates ranging from 43.7 to 99.7%.

CONCLUSION:  Sociodemographic disparities and HRIF program factors are associated with decreased attendance at V2 among VLBW infants. These findings highlight opportunities for quality and process improvement interventions starting in the NICU and continuing through transition to home and community to assure participation in HRIF.

KEY POINTS: · Only 75% of VLBW infants attended the second HRIF visit.. · Those less likely to attend were Black or had rural residence.. · Infants in early intervention or attending first visit within recommended ages were more likely to attend..

DOI10.1055/s-0041-1729889
Alternate JournalAm J Perinatol
PubMed ID34044453